![]() Ideally, your camera in hand will be weather-sealed, easy to navigate in the dark and even operate with gloved hands. How to choose the best camera for astrophotography First up, let’s look at the key factors when choosing a camera for astrophotography. We have a complete essential guide to astrophotography and night photography, if you would like to know more of the ins and outs of how it works – whereas here, we are focusing on cameras. In this guide, we’ll help you find the camera that will allow you to get started shooting the stars. Using a camera to document the splendour of the night sky is incredibly rewarding, not to mention addictive. However, if you have the patience, the rewards for astrophotography can be nothing short of spectacular. It’s a fair bit more complicated than pointing and shooting, that’s for sure. It requires a lot of standing around in cold fields late into the night, not to mention precise exposure calculation and a fair amount of post-capture editing. ![]() Night-sky photography is a tricky discipline. Tim Coleman and the AP team make some picks.įinding the best camera for astrophotography can be a complex matter. So I get the point, but still one can work around it.If you’re planning to shoot the night skies, you’ll need the best camera for astrophotography and night photography. Still, the RF 85/1.4 L would be nice and well, Sigma could help out but can't. The RF 85/2 is imho a good replacement of the EF 85/1.9, has better magnification and IS. The 50/1.4 is overdue, the 35/1.4 also (a 1.2 version should be coming, but. I'm more into manual lenses, so I'm just looking for AF lenses in case my eyesight get's worse.ĭo I want good/better replacements of EF lenses? Of course. Even the EF 50/1.2 L works better due to better AF on RF cameras, EyeAF and other fancy stuff, as I've seen in a review lately. The RF 24-105/4 L is a workhorse and doesn't disappoint.Īnyway, I do agree with your last statement, but there are so many good EF lenses out there to get the job done if you're a pro. I sold my 24-70 mark ii for a new RF 24-105/4 L, just because it's more versatile and my old EF lens sold rather well for nearly the same price. I had the 16/2.8 too, but sold it quite immediately, as it's distortion can't be fixed in RAW easily. ![]() Yes, I can recommend the 35/1.8 macro lens, it's way good enough. Check out the video above for Frost's full thoughts on the camera. USB-C, micro-HDMI, microphone input, and headphone jackĪltogether, the EOS R8 looks like a nicely balanced camera at a good price.2.36-million-dot electronic viewfinder with 120 fps refresh rate.Vertical movie mode for social media content creation.Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with 1,053 automatic autofocus points with full sensor coverage and sensitivity down to -6.5 EV.0.5 seconds of pre-shooting for ensuring quick action is captured.Up to two hours of recording at 29.97 fps.Full-width 4K video at 60 FPS, 10-bit oversampled from 6K.Coming to you from Christopher Frost, this great video review takes a look at the Canon EOS R8 mirrorless camera. At $1,499, the EOS R8 offers photographers a chance to own a full frame camera at a relatively affordable price, along with a range of features, including: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |